02-25-2018, 02:30 PM
(02-25-2018, 01:53 PM)LL-user link Wrote: Suggestion: replace KeepassX by KeepassXC
Once I suggested replacing KeepassX by Keepass2 which I still mainly use (maybe more out of habit). But meanwhile I have also KeepassXC installed and use it, too.
Due to the character of Linux Lite to keep things simple & light I assume KeepassXC would be the better option. No mono and wine required. And nevertheless it offers auto-typing.
Thanks for your consideration
Keepassx (10) actually has less dependencies then Keepassxc (17). Keepassxc also requires a number of qt5 libs. Whats the difference in memory usage?
Download your free copy of Linux Lite today.
Jerry Bezencon
Linux Lite Creator
"Do not correct a fool, or he will hate you; correct a wise man and he will appreciate you."
![[Image: X5qGkCg.png]](https://imgur.com/X5qGkCg.png)
![[Image: lrUHro3.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/lrUHro3.jpg)
Jerry Bezencon
Linux Lite Creator
"Do not correct a fool, or he will hate you; correct a wise man and he will appreciate you."
![[Image: X5qGkCg.png]](https://imgur.com/X5qGkCg.png)
![[Image: 0op1GNe.png]](https://i.imgur.com/0op1GNe.png)
![[Image: LgJ2mtP.png]](https://i.imgur.com/LgJ2mtP.png)
![[Image: vLZcFUE.png]](https://imgur.com/vLZcFUE.png)
![[Image: lrUHro3.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/lrUHro3.jpg)