06-06-2016, 11:18 AM
2.8 uses a completely different init (boot sequence) system to 3.0
2.8 uses upstart and 3.0 uses systemd. IMO, both have their pros and cons, you can easily find anywhere on the net, people who have long boot ups under upstart, and quick boots under systemd. Mine boots so fast under 3.0 that I barely get to see the splash screen.
2.8 uses upstart and 3.0 uses systemd. IMO, both have their pros and cons, you can easily find anywhere on the net, people who have long boot ups under upstart, and quick boots under systemd. Mine boots so fast under 3.0 that I barely get to see the splash screen.
Download your free copy of Linux Lite today.
Jerry Bezencon
Linux Lite Creator
"Do not correct a fool, or he will hate you; correct a wise man and he will appreciate you."
![[Image: X5qGkCg.png]](https://imgur.com/X5qGkCg.png)
![[Image: 0op1GNe.png]](https://i.imgur.com/0op1GNe.png)
![[Image: LgJ2mtP.png]](https://i.imgur.com/LgJ2mtP.png)
![[Image: vLZcFUE.png]](https://imgur.com/vLZcFUE.png)
![[Image: lrUHro3.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/lrUHro3.jpg)
Jerry Bezencon
Linux Lite Creator
"Do not correct a fool, or he will hate you; correct a wise man and he will appreciate you."