See the Security and Bug Fixes Section - Grub EFI Install Updates Fix Sticky


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is Linux Lite 1.0.0 too old?
#6
@Ottowagrant, If it is of any interest I run the latest LL2.8 on two Asus netbooks - 901 Atom processor+1GB ram and 701SD with Celeron processor+1GB ram. Search the Hardware database for full specs as I do not use the SSD in the 901 as its too small.
1) Lenovo T520 i5 LL3.8 8GB ram, fast & stable
2) Medion P4 32bit LL3.8 1GB ram, quite fast & stable
3) eeePC 901 32bit LL3.8 1GB ram, fast & stable
4) eeePC 701 32bit LL3.8 1GB ram, slower & stable but small and light enough to travel with me to New Zealand when visiting family in Blenheim.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Is Linux Lite 1.0.0 too old? - by Ottawagrant - 02-21-2016, 04:49 PM
Re: Is Linux Lite 1.0.0 too old? - by Ottawagrant - 02-21-2016, 05:46 PM
Re: Is Linux Lite 1.0.0 too old? - by rokytnji - 02-21-2016, 06:30 PM
Re: Is Linux Lite 1.0.0 too old? - by LinuxNoob - 02-21-2016, 08:27 PM
Re: Is Linux Lite 1.0.0 too old? - by justme2 - 02-21-2016, 09:01 PM
Re: Is Linux Lite 1.0.0 too old? - by rokytnji - 02-21-2016, 09:12 PM
Re: Is Linux Lite 1.0.0 too old? - by torreydale - 02-22-2016, 02:17 PM
Re: Is Linux Lite 1.0.0 too old? - by avj - 02-22-2016, 02:42 PM
Re: Is Linux Lite 1.0.0 too old? - by rokytnji - 02-23-2016, 03:34 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: