Posts: 1,597
Threads: 85
Joined: Jun 2015
Reputation:
0
10-03-2015, 03:14 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-03-2015, 03:17 PM by torreydale.)
I've always thought it strange that Microsoft uses the below image as the default wallpaper for Windows 10 because, to me, it looks like they just opened the door on someone they were holding in solitary confinement. I would think even they would want to avoid that subliminal message.
Want to thank me? Click my [Thank] link.
Posts: 93
Threads: 11
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
0
(09-29-2015, 01:33 AM)avj link Wrote: I couldn't agree more Microsoft only does things that benefit them in my opinion.
Ironically (given Microsoft's history) isn't that just the definition of competition though?
Don't believe half of what you see and none of what you hear
- Lou Reed
Posts: 530
Threads: 26
Joined: Feb 2015
Reputation:
0
I would have to say that given the evidence, in my opinion microsoft is anti-competition. They have had anti-trust cases brought against them by the US DOJ, and the EU numerous times, because of monopolistic abuses.
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/04/04/busine...wanted=all
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7266629.stm
http://www.pff.org/issues-pubs/pops/pop7...facts.html
http://www.itpro.co.uk/609559/microsoft-...se-over-ie
“I have not failed. I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work.” - Thomas Edison
Posts: 228
Threads: 15
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
0
04-14-2016, 08:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-14-2016, 08:07 PM by Teddy.)
Microsoft certainly does fund towards Linux from the evidence I see. However, they are taking ideas and putting into their Windows OS, to make it appear like they "love" Linux and also to claim that their idea is original. Their own website servers run Linux. That in itself says something.
Lets say Microsoft incorporated Linux ideas and never funded Linux, EVER. How would that look to the press and to the Linux community as a whole? It would look very bad for them to say the least. Hadn't they not have any public pressure on them at all by consumers or the press, they probably wouldn't give a damn dime to the Linux foundation.
Sent from my Note 3 using the Tapatalk Android app.
Theodore,
HP Pavilion TouchSmart 11-e015dx (11-inch "Travelbook")
ASUS Republic Of Gamers G752VT-DH74 (17-inch Main) [6GB Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M GPU, 24GB RAM]
Posts: 108
Threads: 13
Joined: Dec 2015
Reputation:
0
(09-28-2015, 11:56 PM)Jerry link Wrote: Don't forget this is MS, there will be a hidden agenda here unfavorable to linux in the future.
I agree a leopard never changes its spots. I'm a little confused as in how Microsoft can legally do this. They can use open source and sell their OS? Can they even use the word Bash? hmmm
Remember Netscape? I wonder how many forgot about the antitrust scandals back in the day?
2cent~
I'v been bashing Windows way before Microsoft.....
Posts: 893
Threads: 197
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
0
Didn't Microsoft purchase Sun Microsystems, which own half of all Unix/Linux patents? That might explain why Microsoft loves Linux. I think somewhere along the way they also filed claims that open source software infringed their own software patent...
64bit OS (32-bit on
Samsung[i] netbook) installed in [i]Legacy mode on MBR-formatted SSDs (except
pi which uses a micro SDHC card):
2017 -
Raspberry pi 3B (4cores) ~
[email protected] -
LibreElec, used for upgrading our Samsung TV (excellent for the task)
2012 -
Lenovo G580 2689 (2cores; 4threads] ~
[email protected] -
LL3.8/Win8.1 dual-boot (LL working smoothly)
2011 -
Samsung NP-N145 Plus (1core; 2threads) ~ Intel Atom
[email protected] -
LL 3.8 32-bit (64-bit too 'laggy')
2008 -
Asus X71Q (2cores) ~ Intel
[email protected] -
LL4.6/Win8.1 dual-boot, LL works fine with kernel 4.15
2007 -
Dell Latitude D630 (2cores) ~ Intel
[email protected] -
LL4.6, works well with kernel 4.4; 4.15 doesn't work
Posts: 464
Threads: 17
Joined: Feb 2015
Reputation:
0
04-29-2016, 06:23 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-29-2016, 06:26 AM by LL-user.)
Sun has been acquired by Oracle, owned by Larry Ellison, also called the devil of Silicon Valley - for a good reason considering how he treats his employees, customers, and Linux/RedHat.